April 2, 2019 Delivery WG Call Notes

From LADCO Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Action Items

  • Jeff: research terminology
  • Jeff: reach out to MJO training coords for upcoming trainings to test new evaluation instruments
  • Zac: draft WG charge
  • Zac: draft WG ask to get people on board for April 17 call

Attendees

Jeff, Zac

Agenda

  • Review action items
  • Review tasks and prioritize
  • Work on charge and ask for this WG
  • Discuss current e-learning options available through APTI-Learn and elsewhere
  • Review materials sent by other WG's (e.g., instructor list, course inventory)

Call Notes

'Review tasks and prioritize'

  • (1) Instructor list - received from Kara, Jeff will take this on
  • (2) Instructor recruitment flyer - received from Kara, will need to have active recruitment efforts
  • (3) Evaluation instruments - recently developed, passed forward from the JTC workgroups, now need to test the new formats
  • (4) Interactions with instructors
  • (5) Delivery format alternatives - need help from learning/teaching experts, recruit into this workgroup, want to generate excitement about this task in the recruitment ask;
  • (6) Updating instructors on course library updates
  • (7) Update instructors on functionality

'Brainstorm on ask'

  • Terminology - what do we call this?
  • Commitment: At least 1 hour/month, a bit more time earlier on getting familiar with the process
  • Objective is to identify learning alternatives, find opportunities in the training program to implement alternatives, what courses fit
  • Need people with experience in learning alternatives (distance learning? e-learning?)
  • Can we bring in people from outside of the state agencies?
  • How involved are the e-learning courses? Do some courses require more formatting than others?
  • What is the student experience? What is the course developers experience? Is there a role for a learning expert to tailor courses to an e-learning format
  • Need people with experience developing/using e-learning technology, knowledge of alternatives, people with experience using e-learning from the student perspective, people with knowledge of the air pollution training courses to identify opportunities to use e-learning in the curriculum
  • Develop recommendations for the new LMS, what capabilities are needed in the new server